Insight: Are we finally starting to see Starmer’s plans for sport?

Are we finally starting to see Starmer’s plans for sport?


The last few weeks have been positive when it comes to investment in sport in the UK. But it’s a long-time coming. 


It’s been a rocky time for the Prime Minister, as he ends his first year in office in somewhat of a crisis. Considering this, it’s fair to acknowledge that there’s broader political issues and concerns for the PM to address in his early stages in office, but we’re starting to see that sport is on the mind of this government. 


In the build-up to the election, we saw Starmer’s campaign involve a significant sporting focus, regularly seen at professional and community sporting events, the Labour Society For Sport playing a big role and hosting events. Then, the manifesto raised concerns - somewhat underwhelming, jarring from the potential we saw during his campaign trail. 


Then relative silence, until now. Give or take. It’s also worth noting that the Labour Society for Sport posted for the first time in eight months on its website, the other day – timely, perhaps? 


The other week, PM met with England’s Lionesses ahead of their attempt at retaining their Euros title. However, this proved to be more than just a get-together with well-wishing, there was purpose behind it. 


A new approach to PE and school sport was announced, with new School Sport Partnerships and a new Enrichment Framework for schools, designed to ensure all young people have equal access to high-quality sport and extracurricular activity. The PM’s office stated that schools will have a new framework, including a clear focus on equal access and two hours per week of physical education. 


It's a positive step in the right direction, for sure, to ensure that more children have access to the benefits of sport and play. Especially as, still, we’re seeing less than 50% of children across the UK meet the minimum required activity levels. It’s a consistent issue, yet this commitment could potentially be a major first step in the right direction. 


The same week, the government pledged £900m on major sporting events and grassroots facilities, as part of a ‘transformational’ investment. Over half going to supporting major events, ranging across confirmed events and potential future UK-hosted events. 


A minimum of £400m of this is being committed to new and upgraded grassroots sports facilities over the next four years. 


June’s been a busy and expensive month – but it’s been a long time coming. Why now? 


Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Stuart Andrew has warned to be cautious of optimism and recognise the wider challenges: “Funding for major sporting events and grassroots sport is welcome – but the Spending Review was no boon for British sports.


"[Chancellor] Rachel Reeves' tax hikes are forcing schools to sell playing fields and driving up business rates for stadiums. At the same time, Labour have scrapped the Opening Schools Facilities fund and the National Citizen Service – depriving young people of sporting opportunities."


These announcements could well be seen as a bit of much needed good news after a turbulent start to his tenure for the PM. Regardless, it’s needed and finally we are starting to see some of that pre-election enthusiasm for sport. We know what sport can do, let’s make sure it’s there for all. 


Share via:

by Nicholas Rewcastle 9 April 2026
About the Client
by Nicholas Rewcastle 3 April 2026
Team of the Week - 03.04.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 27 March 2026
Team of the Week - 27.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 25 March 2026
About the Client
by Nicholas Rewcastle 20 March 2026
Team of the Week - 20.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 13 March 2026
Team of the Week - 13.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 6 March 2026
Team of the Week - 06.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 5 March 2026
A recent report from Sky News' Rob Harris has highlighted England players’ concerns about feeling pressured to speak out on political issues at major tournaments. Reading this was disappointing, but not surprising. It reflects a growing tension in modern sport: athletes sit at the centre of public conversation, yet many don’t feel supported, prepared or protected when that conversation turns political. Athlete platforms are powerful, their reach is undeniable. But that should not automatically mean they should be the frontline voices on every political or geopolitical issue. It's also fair to assume that not only to many not feel comfortable or qualified to hold that role. The burden of expectation Sporting bodies, brands and even fans now look to athletes to offer a stance whenever a sensitive global issue arises. The expectation is heavy, and the scrutiny is unforgiving. This raises an important question for the industry: Are we empowering athletes to use their platforms responsibly, or are we leaning on them to take positions that organisations themselves are hesitant to lead on? Too often, what starts as an opportunity for authenticity becomes a burden that athletes never asked to shoulder. Where athlete advocacy fits Athletes can, and do, drive meaningful social impact — especially when speaking from lived experience. And perhaps this is where the industry should be focusing its support. There is enormous value in athletes championing social and economic issues that feel natural, relevant and constructive, such as: Improving access to sport Inspiring participation Championing inclusivity Supporting community programmes Highlighting the health and wellbeing benefits of activity Addressing inequalities These are not 'soft' issues, ultimately they shape society and improve lives. This is where athletes are uniquely positioned to influence, without being dragged into politically charged territory. Who should really lead political conversations? If governing bodies, rights holders or organisations wish to take political or ethical positions, they should lead from the front — not rely on athletes to be the public face of those complexities. Athletes can support, amplify and add humanity to important discussions, b ut they should not be the default spokesperson for institutional viewpoints. As the role of athletes continues to evolve, the industry needs a clearer, more responsible framework for how we support them. That means: Giving athletes the freedom to choose if and how they speak Providing education, guidance and safeguarding when they do Reducing pressure to comment on politically sensitive issues Elevating athlete voices in areas where they have genuine authority Ensuring organisations do not outsource political leadership to individuals Ultimately, the goal should be to empower athletes — not overwhelm them. And back them up when they do. Their platforms are at their most powerful not when they’re forced into political commentary, but when they’re sharing stories, insights and perspectives that inspire participation, change communities and open doors for others.
by Nicholas Rewcastle 27 February 2026
Team of the Week - 27.02.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 20 February 2026
Team of the Week - 20.02.26