The purpose of multi-sport events

The Commonwealth Games started with a spectacular opening ceremony celebrating the rich history and culture of Birmingham. It showcased the city’s critical role in the industrial revolution, its multicultural atmosphere and celebrated the local musicians. The ceremony brought in all of the Commonwealth’s 72 nations & territories and over 4,000 athletes in front of a crowd of 30,000 people at the Alexander Stadium. 

Multi-sport events such as the Commonwealth Games are, without a doubt, one of the highlights of the sporting calendar. Whether you like athletics, swimming or gymnastics, there is something for everyone to watch and enjoy. Unlike the Olympics, the Commonwealth Games brings together a new collection of sports that are popular within the Commonwealth countries. Sports such as cricket, squash, netball and lawn bowls have their opportunity to shine.

The ‘Friendly Games’, as it is more affectionately known, offers a great sense of camaraderie among teams, supporters and the entire Commonwealth of Nations. Team England’s narrative this year is all about being ‘Part of The Pride’ – and being involved, watching or following an event like this does instil a strong sense of pride in all of us.

That pride is somewhat even more heightened for certain nations and territories that don’t often get the chance to compete on the biggest global sporting stages. The Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Jersey, and the Isle of Man are a small example of those that are enjoying their moment, lapping it up quite rightly and everyone is loving it! We also have the rare opportunity to the Home Nations; England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales competing separately as well. They go from teammates to rivals for 11 days, test themselves in different ways against new competitors and aim to ‘Bring it home’. 

But the Games, and multi-sporting events is about much more than just the competition and pride it instils. There are deep-rooted social and political issues that arise, as well as the L-word…legacy.

The Games' connection to the Commonwealth is a unique history for a sporting event. Starting in 1930, they were originally called the British Empire Games. However, the tournament has drastically evolved since then. The newly branded Commonwealth Games was created after many countries' connections to the British Empire faded and the Commonwealth as we know it was formed. 

However, with this history comes a darker side too. The history of the Commonwealth and its connection to colonisation is not one that can be forgotten. Much of this legacy is still very prevalent in many countries competing in the Commonwealth Games. For example, with more than half the countries competing, homosexuality is criminalised. These laws were passed down through colonisation and their existence to this day is proof of the lasting effects. Tom Daley, a powerful voice for equality, delivered the Queen's Baton to the Opening Ceremony surrounded by a parade of LGBTQ+ progress flags carried by citizens of countries that criminalise homosexuality. The Games is using its platform to deliver some of the most pertinent and powerful messages to the world.   

Speaking of nations, one of the mange issues surrounding the Commonwealth Games, as well as many other events, is around the challenge of finding a host nation. An increasing number of nations are unable to host sporting events due to lack of funding or infrastructure, let alone security and political issues. The 2022 Birmingham Games for example were originally meant to be in Durban. It would have been the first time the Commonwealth Games would have been held in Africa but unfortunately, after not being able to secure their budget, the Games had to go elsewhere. 

It's a shame really, as there’s clearly a positive impact that hosting tournaments such as the Commonwealth Games can have on nations and cities, let alone the opportunity to make their mark on the global stage. We have to ask, is there more that can be done to allow more countries to have their moment? 

Right now, we are seeing first-hand how Birmingham is buzzing with the energy of the Commonwealth Games being hosted there and has been an incredible opportunity for them to showcase the history and culture of their great city not only to the rest of the UK but all over the world. Not only have the games been a big boost for tourism but potentially local economies as well. 

We always talk about legacy around major sporting events. We know that major sporting moments such as London 2012 ten years ago, or even the recent Lionesses win won’t spark a shift in participation and drive huge number of people to sport. The real work needs to happen behind the scenes to capitalise on this moment and create a sustainable future for grassroots sport.

But, for now, fair play to Birmingham. The city has seized this moment to spread important messages and are having a blast hosting the Games!

Share via:

by Nicholas Rewcastle 9 April 2026
About the Client
by Nicholas Rewcastle 3 April 2026
Team of the Week - 03.04.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 27 March 2026
Team of the Week - 27.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 25 March 2026
About the Client
by Nicholas Rewcastle 20 March 2026
Team of the Week - 20.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 13 March 2026
Team of the Week - 13.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 6 March 2026
Team of the Week - 06.03.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 5 March 2026
A recent report from Sky News' Rob Harris has highlighted England players’ concerns about feeling pressured to speak out on political issues at major tournaments. Reading this was disappointing, but not surprising. It reflects a growing tension in modern sport: athletes sit at the centre of public conversation, yet many don’t feel supported, prepared or protected when that conversation turns political. Athlete platforms are powerful, their reach is undeniable. But that should not automatically mean they should be the frontline voices on every political or geopolitical issue. It's also fair to assume that not only to many not feel comfortable or qualified to hold that role. The burden of expectation Sporting bodies, brands and even fans now look to athletes to offer a stance whenever a sensitive global issue arises. The expectation is heavy, and the scrutiny is unforgiving. This raises an important question for the industry: Are we empowering athletes to use their platforms responsibly, or are we leaning on them to take positions that organisations themselves are hesitant to lead on? Too often, what starts as an opportunity for authenticity becomes a burden that athletes never asked to shoulder. Where athlete advocacy fits Athletes can, and do, drive meaningful social impact — especially when speaking from lived experience. And perhaps this is where the industry should be focusing its support. There is enormous value in athletes championing social and economic issues that feel natural, relevant and constructive, such as: Improving access to sport Inspiring participation Championing inclusivity Supporting community programmes Highlighting the health and wellbeing benefits of activity Addressing inequalities These are not 'soft' issues, ultimately they shape society and improve lives. This is where athletes are uniquely positioned to influence, without being dragged into politically charged territory. Who should really lead political conversations? If governing bodies, rights holders or organisations wish to take political or ethical positions, they should lead from the front — not rely on athletes to be the public face of those complexities. Athletes can support, amplify and add humanity to important discussions, b ut they should not be the default spokesperson for institutional viewpoints. As the role of athletes continues to evolve, the industry needs a clearer, more responsible framework for how we support them. That means: Giving athletes the freedom to choose if and how they speak Providing education, guidance and safeguarding when they do Reducing pressure to comment on politically sensitive issues Elevating athlete voices in areas where they have genuine authority Ensuring organisations do not outsource political leadership to individuals Ultimately, the goal should be to empower athletes — not overwhelm them. And back them up when they do. Their platforms are at their most powerful not when they’re forced into political commentary, but when they’re sharing stories, insights and perspectives that inspire participation, change communities and open doors for others.
by Nicholas Rewcastle 27 February 2026
Team of the Week - 27.02.26
by Nicholas Rewcastle 20 February 2026
Team of the Week - 20.02.26