The purpose of rugby union
Before delving into the purpose of rugby union, we want to wish everyone at, and associated to, both Worcester Warriors and Wasps all the best as they endure a truly challenging time. We hope that the financial situations of both clubs are resolved, and all staff, players and fans return to a safe and secure environment. Now, on with the blog…
As the age-old story goes, rugby was created by none other than the legendary William Webb Ellis back in 1823 when he picked up the ball during a game of football and ran with it. It seems so simple, but since then, Rugby Union has become one of the most popular sports in the world. Over the years, the sport has developed into a game of strength, speed, skill, and passion. It also established the values of integrity, passion, solidarity, discipline, and respect, as outlined by World Rugby in 2009. These values have been ever-present throughout the game as rugby has built a reputation for having friendly fans where home and away crowds stand together, strong levels of respect for both playing and refereeing and a culture of inclusivity where everyone can compete no matter what size you are.
And while rugby union in many ways has built a great reputation as a game of chivalry and respect, it is also known as a sport for the rich and the elite. In last month’s blog, we explored the purpose of rugby league, and we investigated how the elitism we see today in rugby was ultimately created by the decision to keep rugby an amateur game, barring anyone that couldn’t afford it to play. Even since making the game professional, its connections to private schools and a large concentration of players in the rich south of England, rugby union has struggled to shake off the elitist image it built up so many years ago.
With that said, rugby union has come a long way since its amateur days when it comes to inclusivity. Few moments shine greater for the sport than the 1995 Rugby World Cup when an undervalued and dismissed South African side, of mixed race and ability, showed the world the power of inclusion, driven by the great Nelson Mandela.
For English rugby fans, Jonny Wilkinson’s drop goal in 2003 will remain etched in memories forever.
Those moments of greatness on the pitch have delivered so much off the pitch at all levels of the game. Following the 2003 World Cup, the numbers of young people playing the sport aged seven to 12 rose by 28 per cent
over the three years after the tournament in Australia, while among teenagers (aged 13-18) there was a 16 per cent increase.
We are the first to say that major events don’t drive participation, but 2003 surely gave it a good shot. Although, the RFU was prepared, the government invested and naturally the sport grew.
And now we are seeing new levels of growth, albeit many will rightly argue, later than it should have. Nonetheless, rugby has taken a leading role in the growth of women’s sports in England. The England national team, aka the Red Roses, have made headlines in recent weeks as they are on a 25-game winning streak, the most of any national rugby team - male or female. As they go into the women’s World Cup in two weeks' time, their winning streak is unlikely to end soon and go into the tournament as firm favourites.
Whilst the women’s World Cup in New Zealand is gearing up to be a great spectacle, sadly the state of club rugby at home is dire. Worcester Warriors have been placed into administration and suspended from the Premiership after not meeting the RFU’s funding deadline. Wasps have also filed for administration to help with the club's financial situation, after they have struggled with the repayment of a £35 million bond to help with their relocation in 2014. With two clubs falling victim to financial difficulty, it begs to question what went wrong and how this has happened. No doubt thorough investigations will take place, with the RFU and Premiership Rugby behind those, but also being scrutinised at the same time. The devastation that this brings for not only the club, but the community is severe. From players and staff who are out of a job, the club charities that have delivered such good locally and the fans and those around who rely on the love and passion of their club – it’s heartbreaking.
Many blame Covid-19 for the financial pressure the sport is facing. But is it fair to just blame the pandemic when many clubs were making a loss before? Numerous club executives and owners have come out to say that premiership rugby business models are flawed and need to be overhauled. Saracens CEO, Lucy Wray, spoke to City AM
about how important it is for Premiership Rugby to make changes that prevent more clubs from going down a similar fate as Worcester and Wasps.
From a sport that was once known for its elitism and its richness to being on the back pages for its financial difficulty, rugby’s turbulent journey continues. It’s a sport that doesn’t make it easy for itself, but brings so much joy to all when it goes right. Through the highs and lows, fans and players have always remained deeply passionate about the game.
It seems that now is the chance for the sport to not only grow the domestic game, but to also rejuvenate the entire structure, from business models to diversity – and perhaps even parity. Priorities have to be to sort the financial mess, of course, but as it does that and emerges from darkness, it’s fundamental that the sport considers its responsibility to diversity and inclusion, focusing on the potential that the women’s game has, ensuring more young people from varying backgrounds and communities engage in some way and we see an even more representative elite playing group on our pitches.
For now, we all eagerly await good news from Worcester and Wasps, whilst keenly watching the Red Roses dominate in New Zealand.
Share via:
About the Client
Team of the Week - 05.09.25
Team of the Week - 29.08.25
A look back at our work with Active Sussex
Team of the Week - 22.08.25
A look back at our work with World Rugby ahead of the 2025 Rugby World Cup
Team of the Week - 15.08.25
Team of the Week - 08.08.25
Team of the Week - 01.08.25
As The Hundred returns for its fifth year this August, familiar debates about its merits and flaws will return, however, the conversation is shifting. Private investment has entered the competition on a major scale. Stakes in six of the eight teams have already been sold with the majority of investment coming from global cricket heavyweights in the Indian Premier League, such as, the GMR Group's 49% acquisition of Southern Brave. In the short term, the number of teams will remain the same until at least 2028, but change is already in motion: Potential rebrands — Several franchises are expected to align their identities with global sister teams. Rising salaries — Top men’s player pay has jumped 60% to £200,000, while leading women’s salaries are up 30% to £65,000, with investor influence potentially driving further increases to attract world-class talent. Format and scheduling debates — New owners may push for a switch from the 100-ball format to the globally popular T20. Women’s cricket evolution — Double-headers have been standard since 2021, but the ECB is now exploring standalone women’s fixtures with the goal of drawing full-capacity crowds within a few years. The England & Wales Cricket Board (ECB) will retain control over competition regulations, but a new governing board, including investor and county representatives, will influence player recruitment, salaries, and the draft system, potentially replacing it with an IPL - Indian Premier League India style auction. These changes present both opportunities and challenges for franchises: to harness global investment for community impact, to innovate fan engagement, and to ensure the growth of the women’s and men’s games remains balanced. The next few seasons will determine whether The Hundred evolves into a truly global competition or will it risk losing the distinct identity it has built since 2021?