The purpose of rugby union
Before delving into the purpose of rugby union, we want to wish everyone at, and associated to, both Worcester Warriors and Wasps all the best as they endure a truly challenging time. We hope that the financial situations of both clubs are resolved, and all staff, players and fans return to a safe and secure environment. Now, on with the blog…
As the age-old story goes, rugby was created by none other than the legendary William Webb Ellis back in 1823 when he picked up the ball during a game of football and ran with it. It seems so simple, but since then, Rugby Union has become one of the most popular sports in the world. Over the years, the sport has developed into a game of strength, speed, skill, and passion. It also established the values of integrity, passion, solidarity, discipline, and respect, as outlined by World Rugby in 2009. These values have been ever-present throughout the game as rugby has built a reputation for having friendly fans where home and away crowds stand together, strong levels of respect for both playing and refereeing and a culture of inclusivity where everyone can compete no matter what size you are.
And while rugby union in many ways has built a great reputation as a game of chivalry and respect, it is also known as a sport for the rich and the elite. In last month’s blog, we explored the purpose of rugby league, and we investigated how the elitism we see today in rugby was ultimately created by the decision to keep rugby an amateur game, barring anyone that couldn’t afford it to play. Even since making the game professional, its connections to private schools and a large concentration of players in the rich south of England, rugby union has struggled to shake off the elitist image it built up so many years ago.
With that said, rugby union has come a long way since its amateur days when it comes to inclusivity. Few moments shine greater for the sport than the 1995 Rugby World Cup when an undervalued and dismissed South African side, of mixed race and ability, showed the world the power of inclusion, driven by the great Nelson Mandela.
For English rugby fans, Jonny Wilkinson’s drop goal in 2003 will remain etched in memories forever.
Those moments of greatness on the pitch have delivered so much off the pitch at all levels of the game. Following the 2003 World Cup, the numbers of young people playing the sport aged seven to 12 rose by 28 per cent
over the three years after the tournament in Australia, while among teenagers (aged 13-18) there was a 16 per cent increase.
We are the first to say that major events don’t drive participation, but 2003 surely gave it a good shot. Although, the RFU was prepared, the government invested and naturally the sport grew.
And now we are seeing new levels of growth, albeit many will rightly argue, later than it should have. Nonetheless, rugby has taken a leading role in the growth of women’s sports in England. The England national team, aka the Red Roses, have made headlines in recent weeks as they are on a 25-game winning streak, the most of any national rugby team - male or female. As they go into the women’s World Cup in two weeks' time, their winning streak is unlikely to end soon and go into the tournament as firm favourites.
Whilst the women’s World Cup in New Zealand is gearing up to be a great spectacle, sadly the state of club rugby at home is dire. Worcester Warriors have been placed into administration and suspended from the Premiership after not meeting the RFU’s funding deadline. Wasps have also filed for administration to help with the club's financial situation, after they have struggled with the repayment of a £35 million bond to help with their relocation in 2014. With two clubs falling victim to financial difficulty, it begs to question what went wrong and how this has happened. No doubt thorough investigations will take place, with the RFU and Premiership Rugby behind those, but also being scrutinised at the same time. The devastation that this brings for not only the club, but the community is severe. From players and staff who are out of a job, the club charities that have delivered such good locally and the fans and those around who rely on the love and passion of their club – it’s heartbreaking.
Many blame Covid-19 for the financial pressure the sport is facing. But is it fair to just blame the pandemic when many clubs were making a loss before? Numerous club executives and owners have come out to say that premiership rugby business models are flawed and need to be overhauled. Saracens CEO, Lucy Wray, spoke to City AM
about how important it is for Premiership Rugby to make changes that prevent more clubs from going down a similar fate as Worcester and Wasps.
From a sport that was once known for its elitism and its richness to being on the back pages for its financial difficulty, rugby’s turbulent journey continues. It’s a sport that doesn’t make it easy for itself, but brings so much joy to all when it goes right. Through the highs and lows, fans and players have always remained deeply passionate about the game.
It seems that now is the chance for the sport to not only grow the domestic game, but to also rejuvenate the entire structure, from business models to diversity – and perhaps even parity. Priorities have to be to sort the financial mess, of course, but as it does that and emerges from darkness, it’s fundamental that the sport considers its responsibility to diversity and inclusion, focusing on the potential that the women’s game has, ensuring more young people from varying backgrounds and communities engage in some way and we see an even more representative elite playing group on our pitches.
For now, we all eagerly await good news from Worcester and Wasps, whilst keenly watching the Red Roses dominate in New Zealand.
Share via:
About the Client
Team of the Week - 03.04.26
Team of the Week - 27.03.26
About the Client
Team of the Week - 20.03.26
Team of the Week - 13.03.26
Team of the Week - 06.03.26
A recent report from Sky News' Rob Harris has highlighted England players’ concerns about feeling pressured to speak out on political issues at major tournaments. Reading this was disappointing, but not surprising. It reflects a growing tension in modern sport: athletes sit at the centre of public conversation, yet many don’t feel supported, prepared or protected when that conversation turns political. Athlete platforms are powerful, their reach is undeniable. But that should not automatically mean they should be the frontline voices on every political or geopolitical issue. It's also fair to assume that not only to many not feel comfortable or qualified to hold that role. The burden of expectation Sporting bodies, brands and even fans now look to athletes to offer a stance whenever a sensitive global issue arises. The expectation is heavy, and the scrutiny is unforgiving. This raises an important question for the industry: Are we empowering athletes to use their platforms responsibly, or are we leaning on them to take positions that organisations themselves are hesitant to lead on? Too often, what starts as an opportunity for authenticity becomes a burden that athletes never asked to shoulder. Where athlete advocacy fits Athletes can, and do, drive meaningful social impact — especially when speaking from lived experience. And perhaps this is where the industry should be focusing its support. There is enormous value in athletes championing social and economic issues that feel natural, relevant and constructive, such as: Improving access to sport Inspiring participation Championing inclusivity Supporting community programmes Highlighting the health and wellbeing benefits of activity Addressing inequalities These are not 'soft' issues, ultimately they shape society and improve lives. This is where athletes are uniquely positioned to influence, without being dragged into politically charged territory. Who should really lead political conversations? If governing bodies, rights holders or organisations wish to take political or ethical positions, they should lead from the front — not rely on athletes to be the public face of those complexities. Athletes can support, amplify and add humanity to important discussions, b ut they should not be the default spokesperson for institutional viewpoints. As the role of athletes continues to evolve, the industry needs a clearer, more responsible framework for how we support them. That means: Giving athletes the freedom to choose if and how they speak Providing education, guidance and safeguarding when they do Reducing pressure to comment on politically sensitive issues Elevating athlete voices in areas where they have genuine authority Ensuring organisations do not outsource political leadership to individuals Ultimately, the goal should be to empower athletes — not overwhelm them. And back them up when they do. Their platforms are at their most powerful not when they’re forced into political commentary, but when they’re sharing stories, insights and perspectives that inspire participation, change communities and open doors for others.
Team of the Week - 27.02.26
Team of the Week - 20.02.26