What Patagonia’s ‘gift to earth’ means for authenticity
Nick Rewcastle, Managing Director of New Reach PR, ponders in SportsPro
whether Patagonia’s lauded decision to commit all future profits towards protecting the planet could mark a shift in the meaning of brand authenticity.
Patagonia has ‘given their company to planet Earth’. In layman’s terms, what that means is that the ownership of the company has been transferred to two charitable trusts, allowing profits not required to be reinvested into the running of the business to go directly towards fighting the effect of climate change.
The brand claims that “instead of ‘going public’, you could say we’re ‘going purpose’.” It’s fair to say that sacrificing profit to instead give back to the planet is pretty purpose-led.
The news spread like wildfire across the US and overnight here in the UK, before we knew it, every daily was running it. It was even the second most read story on BBC News – yes, in the week after The Queen’s death.
However, the best thing about this was that it wasn’t a ‘PR activation’ from Patagonia – this is genuine. Patagonia embodies the definition of being a purpose-led business. It actually cares. We can’t ignore the fact that founder Yvon Chouinard (pictured above) is a billionaire, but the authenticity comes from the fact that instead of financial growth, he commits to giving back and to his values.
Chouinard has written an open letter detailing the reasons behind this decision. He claims that he never wanted to be a businessman, things escalated and before he knew it, Patagonia was what it was. He never wanted to be a billionaire, and just wants to do good – that ethos has resonated through the brand’s existence.
Now, Earth is Patagonia’s ‘only stakeholder’. It’s powerful, and everyone is talking about it. Could we regard this as the most authentic moment in business history?
For a few years now, in the rise of the purpose-led movement, and the need for brands to be seen to do good, the definition of authenticity has been scrutinised. Nobody has really come up with the answer. Perhaps unbeknown to Chouinard, we finally have our answer.
Is this the big shift that we needed in authentic action?
Share via:
About the Client
Team of the Week - 05.09.25
Team of the Week - 29.08.25
A look back at our work with Active Sussex
Team of the Week - 22.08.25
A look back at our work with World Rugby ahead of the 2025 Rugby World Cup
Team of the Week - 15.08.25
Team of the Week - 08.08.25
Team of the Week - 01.08.25
As The Hundred returns for its fifth year this August, familiar debates about its merits and flaws will return, however, the conversation is shifting. Private investment has entered the competition on a major scale. Stakes in six of the eight teams have already been sold with the majority of investment coming from global cricket heavyweights in the Indian Premier League, such as, the GMR Group's 49% acquisition of Southern Brave. In the short term, the number of teams will remain the same until at least 2028, but change is already in motion: Potential rebrands — Several franchises are expected to align their identities with global sister teams. Rising salaries — Top men’s player pay has jumped 60% to £200,000, while leading women’s salaries are up 30% to £65,000, with investor influence potentially driving further increases to attract world-class talent. Format and scheduling debates — New owners may push for a switch from the 100-ball format to the globally popular T20. Women’s cricket evolution — Double-headers have been standard since 2021, but the ECB is now exploring standalone women’s fixtures with the goal of drawing full-capacity crowds within a few years. The England & Wales Cricket Board (ECB) will retain control over competition regulations, but a new governing board, including investor and county representatives, will influence player recruitment, salaries, and the draft system, potentially replacing it with an IPL - Indian Premier League India style auction. These changes present both opportunities and challenges for franchises: to harness global investment for community impact, to innovate fan engagement, and to ensure the growth of the women’s and men’s games remains balanced. The next few seasons will determine whether The Hundred evolves into a truly global competition or will it risk losing the distinct identity it has built since 2021?